Home    New Items    Clearance Items    Item Search    About Us   Our Needs     My Reeded Edge
   
 
 
U.S. Coin Inventory    
 
Elite Certified Coins
 
U.S. Currency           
 
Ancient Coins                       
Build-A-Set                   
Bullion- US 90% Silver
Bullion Related Items          
Coin Collections/Sets          
Coin Rolls                            
Consignment Corner           
Dealer Lots                           
Documents & Autographs   
Errors                                    
Exonumia                              
Foreign Coins                       
Foreign Currency                 
Foreign Proof/Mint Sets     
Gold Coins/Generic U.S.
Grab Bags                             
Hard Times/CW Tokens    
Jewelry/Estate                      
Jewelry/Promotional            
Mint Sets                                
New Store Items           
Philatelic/Stamps                   
Political Americana              
Proof Sets                             
Silver/Gold Eagles                 
Sports Collectibles                
Supplies                                
Everything Else                    
Webstore
Help
Page!

Ostromecki Removal Due to Letter(con't)

Sept. 7 e-mail from Cliff Mishler to Chris Cipoletti with copies to all ANA board members and Chet Krause:

     Dear Chris:

    The situation concerning the handling of ANA Museum naming rights, involving the contribution made by the anonymous donor, Chet Krause and myself, started out being a very disappointing development, as I indicated to you and several board members during the course of individual conversations at the San Francisco ANA, but as time has passed we have found it to be very, very disgusting.
     In the face of documented evidence to the contrary, you and the board have elected to undercut us and Ed Rochette where museum naming rights are concerned. While I acknowledge that $1 million was the figure that was originally thrown out for "museum naming rights," those rights were offered by you to another party for $500,000. There was no mention at that time, nor subsequently in my presence, that the lesser amount would only qualify for "gallery naming rights."
     While there was certainly no specific discussion between us concerning the qualification level our combined contributions would meet, we are deeply disillusioned by the fact that following the unfurling of the banner at headquarters on Saturday, July 2, you did not see fit to tap Chet or myself on the shoulder and reveal that there was a misunderstanding at hand. To have learned about it through third party e-mail communications, and the "Living Legacy" item that had then been committed to publication in the August issue of Numismatist, was a most unacceptable approach.
     While I am certainly willing to sit down and discuss this matter with you and Bill Horton, or any members of the board, I can tell you that nothing you can do short of' naming the museum after Edward C. Rochette will pacify us. You indicate you "cannot undo what has occurred," so what is there to talk about? The matters of our feelings relative to the adverse influences on the conduct of the fundraising campaign, wrought by you and the board, are certainly water under the bridge, as Chet indicated in his Sept. 6 note to you.
     We'll go on with our lives, and you and the others concerned can go on with theirs. Life is too short to continue wrangling over these matters, but I can assure you that our concerns and disgust will be with us for a long time.

     Sincerely yours,
     Clifford Mishler

Sept. 10 letter from Walter Ostromecki to Cliff Mishler in response to e-mail:

     Dear Cliff

      I am in receipt of your E-mail/letter of 6 September 2005. I appreciate your insights and comments regarding this situation regarding the ANA Museum Gallery naming rights. You have provided this new Board member with so vital information details pertaining to this issue that I had no knowledge of.
      I, too, am very very disgusted at the out come. I have voiced my concerns during a Board conference call as so. The loss of an $500,000 was most upsetting. Fundraising donations of that nature do not grow on trees! I only wish there had been some written notes - a paper trail - outlining the agreed points of the earlier conversations.

Click here to continue